16 thoughts on “LA Times Crossword Answers 31 Dec 2017, Sunday”

  1. LAT: 21:41, no errors. Newsday: 16:59, no errors. I did both of these after an embarrassing encounter with today’s NYT puzzle (an episode of the kind that make one wonder about one’s own mental state … ? … ?).

  2. First time I ever completed the entire crossword puzzle before figuring out the theme. And, then, I still didn’t get why 113A and the theme would lead to anagrams of countries.

  3. 38:54. Easier than average for a Sunday, but I never got the theme until coming here.

    Dave – I had a similar NYT experience but not to your degree. It’s posted over there.

    Average number of years of retirement is 18? So if I retire at 82, I should live to be 100….

    Carrie – Too funny. That was an accidental typo I didn’t even notice until I read your comment. Freudian slip??

    Best –

  4. Btw – today is the only day in history where anyone of voting age was born in the 1900’s and anyone not of voting age was born in the 2000’s…..

  5. Finished the puzzle easily, but had to come here to get the theme. A tad obscure. Perhaps the title should have been an anagram, say “C, U no try”, for “country.” Lame, I know, but closer to the mark than the one provided.

  6. I have seen the term “natick” used ocassionally by contributors to this blog to refer to an error. Does anyone know the origin of the term?
    Thanks…

    1. It’s a reference that refers to an entry that could generally not be expected as common knowledge, especially when crossed with another similar entry. Its namesake is Natick, Massachusetts which was clued in a New York Times puzzle as [Boston Marathon eighth mile]. The general implication is that a solver would either have to be intimately familiar with either Massachusetts geography or the Boston Marathon to be able to know this particular entry. This is highly unlikely.

      More or less in using that term, I was saying that RATEL crossed with CATALPA simply resulted in a guess at the intersection because I never heard of either one and think that most solvers likely wouldn’t know either one.

  7. I finished, but fail to see how “wild country” can be construed as “anagram of a country”, literally, or otherwise. ‘Wild’ does not mean ‘mixed up’, unless you want to be politically incorrect. Or if you want to be politically incorrect by suggesting that all those countries are wild. Seems like someone tried to be tricky and hit a foul ball.

  8. Okay, so I’ve stayed up long enough to do tomorrow’s LAT: 12:18 after getting the silent treatment and fixing an error (mostly the result of a TV thing I was unaware of, but with a little stupidity mixed in).

    I’ve also stayed up long enough to verify that my answer for Friday’s WSJ meta was correct; apparently, a lot of people went for a too-easy, too-obvious answer, so maybe, for once, I have a little better shot than usual at that mug … ?.

    Annnddd … by staying up another hour, I could see in the New Year, but I’m old and crotchety, and I think that the year – here’s hoping it’s a better one than the last one! – will arrive with or without me, so I’m going off to bed … ?.

  9. HAPPY NEW YEAR!! ?
    Here’s hoping this year brings some GOOD news…?
    Re: the theme: I think the idea was that the country letters were mixed up wildly. I don’t think the setter intended it as any commentary on the particular countries… Just the letters were all wild and crazy, being out of order.
    Total Natick for me too at CATALPA/RATEL. Didn’t know either!! ? Also had to peek at a few answers in order to finish this thing. Not a bad puzzle, just tricky in places.
    Enjoy your New Year’s Day everyone!
    Be well~~™?✌

  10. I read where Major General used to be Sgt Major General at one time. That’s the reason why it was below Lt. General.

  11. We usually find the puzzle ‘themes’ quite clever, but this one is just plain stupidly contrived!
    What have most of the countries given as answers got to do with ‘wild country’?
    We stupidly wasted a lot of time on this idiotic offering!

  12. Shouldn’t 113 across say, “what anagramatically ends each answer,” rather than “literally”? We, too, found the theme a bit abtuse and not as fun as usual.

Comments are closed.